01
AI-assisted, human-edited
Agents may help research, outline, draft, critique, code, or format material. A human editor should review substance, tone, examples, claims, and final publication choices.
Editorial policyStandards for
Standards for
agentic design publishing.
The school publishes practical learning material about fast-moving AI tools. This policy covers AI assistance, corrections, disclosures, and human review.
Standards
Useful, specific, and reviewable beats hype.
Readers should be able to tell what was tested, what is opinion, and what may change.
02
Practical claims need context
Tool guidance should identify the tested context where possible: date, product version or plan, workflow, assumptions, and limits. Current product behavior should be checked before publication when the claim is time-sensitive.
03
Updates should be visible
Substantive corrections, replaced examples, and material updates should be noted on the relevant page or article so readers can see what changed.
Disclosures
Commercial context belongs beside the content.
Sponsored work, paid placements, affiliate links, free access, review copies, or material commercial relationships should be disclosed near the relevant content, not hidden on a separate page.
Editorial opinions should not be sold as endorsements. If a sponsor influences scope, access, timing, or compensation, readers should be told in clear language.
Review
Corrections and legal-sensitive topics.
Legal, compliance, security, privacy, accessibility, and professional-advice-sensitive material should carry an editorial or counsel-review note when it is not final. Correction requests can use the public contact path on the newsletter or about page until a dedicated editorial inbox is published.